Joseph
Smith charges Almon Babbitt with misrepresenting him about the debating school incident. Testimony on both sides. Almon confesses
to doing harm, but not to lying §. Age of Reason referenced
§. |
|
Date |
|
December 28, 1835 |
|
Kirtland council, 131–134. |
Location |
|
Kirtland, Ohio. |
|
|
Description |
|
a meeting of the High Council
of the church of the Latter Day Saints
|
|
|
Presiding |
|
President Sidney Rigdon |
|
|
Clerk |
|
Not named. |
|
|
Counselors |
|
William E. McLellin
D. W. Patten (h)
John Smith
Orson Johnson
Jared Carter
Luke Johnson (h) |
Orson Hyde
(h)
Lyman Johnson (h)
Samuel H. Smith
Martin Harris
Brigham Young
Parley Pratt (h) |
|
Original:
W. E. McLelin
This council consists of seven apostles (William, David, Luke and Lyman, Orson, Brigham, and Parley) and five high priests (John, Orson, Jared, Samuel, and Martin).
|
Open |
¶ |
Prayer by Sidney Rigdon. … |
|
|
Joseph's
complaint |
¶ |
[132] Joseph submits a complaint: |
|
"… having
prefered a charge against Elder Almon Babbit for traducing my character,
he was this morning called before the High Council …" Diary-2,
91. |
|
¶ |
To the Presidents of the High Council, |
|
Almon
Babbitt misrepresenting me |
¶ |
Brethren, Almon Babbitt has been misreprepresenting
me to certain of the brethren. I therefore prefer a complaint to the council
that the subject may be investigated, that my character and influence
may be preserved as far as it can in righteousness. |
|
Original
throughout: Babbit
Almon Babbitt (1813–1856) baptized [1833], Zion’s Camp, seventy,
Kirtland stake president (1841–1843), attorney, disfellowshipped
(1839, 1841, 1843, 1851), Territorial Utah's first delegate to Congress,
killed by Indians.
|
|
¶ |
Yours in the bonds
of the New & everlasting
covenant. Joseph Smith Junr. |
|
Counselors
speak |
¶ |
Three counselors are selected to speak on each
side. |
|
Three
speak on each side for difficult cases. |
Lyman
Wight: Babbitt said Joseph got mad because he lost debate |
|
Elder L Wight was called and stated what led to the affair was a difference in opinion respecting keeping their meeting. Elder Babbitt said
J. Smith Junr. got mad because he got overpowered in argumint as Babbitt
had remarked before |
|
Debating School
Incident, 1835–1836
Lyman Wight |
|
|
L. Wight, said men would get over
the mark, in advocating error. |
|
|
Babbitt
said Joseph cause of disturbance |
|
Babbitt said a
man must be a very weak man if he could not argue aginst the truth without
being swerved Babbitt said he (Smith) got mad because he was overpowered
in argument. There would have been no disturbance if he had not got mad. |
|
|
Elder
Orton |
|
Elder Orton agreed with what L. Wight had stated. Dont know whether the conversation was heard by any one else. |
|
Roger Orton |
Babbit
can
read Paine
Joseph's bad spirit |
|
Babbitt
said he could read Tho. Paine or any other work
without being swerved. B. Said this by the door of the House, and appeared
dissatisfied with J. Smiths bad spirit. |
|
Thomas Paine § |
Lyman
Wight: Babbitt's bad spirit |
|
Elder L. Wight thought Babbitt showed a bad spirit
against J. Smith. |
|
|
Lyman
Sherman
Defends Babbit |
¶ |
L.
Sherman testifies he has not heard Babbitt
say anything against Joseph. When the council asks if he has seen Babbitt
"exhibit a restless or a dissatisfied spirit," he responds, |
|
Lyman Sherman |
Jesting |
|
on the Flats one or two days
after the transaction at the debate, Babbitt said of his party. If
it was not able one way, it was another, by knocking down. Sherman understood,
that if they could not [133] overpower by argument, they would by knocking down.
but said in a jesting way. |
|
|
Babbit
said Joseph the cause |
|
Babbitt said we would not have
had any difficulty, if J. Smith had not have got mad. |
|
|
Babbitt's
singular spirit |
|
Babbitt has a singular
Spirit. Babbitt gave him an idea that he had a difficulty with J. Smith. |
|
|
Benjamin
Johnson: riled v. mad |
|
Benjamin Johnson testifies Joseph
seemed "riled" and William was "mad." |
|
|
Brigham
Young:
Babbitt and Bishop agree |
|
Brigham Young testifies that Babbitt
"agreed with Bishop. about being swerved when debating questions, must
be weak minded." |
|
Possibly
Francis Gladden Bishop (18091878), president of the branch at Westfield,
New York, who confessed to "advancing heretical doctrines" in September. Minutes
of September 28, 1835 |
Babbitt
said Joseph got mad because he lost |
|
Babbitt said Smith would not
have wanted the school broke up, if they had not got defeated. |
|
Brigham
supports Joseph |
|
Young did not hear any thing from Smith at school
that was calculated to hurt feelings and character. |
|
|
Babbitt
denigrated presidency, meant to hurt Joseph |
|
he also thinks he Babbitt cast reflections
on the whole Presidency, as well as J. Smith Junr. and that what Babbitt
said was calculated to hurt J. Smith. |
|
|
Babbitt
said Joseph against the school |
|
Babbitt said that Smith was
against the school. |
|
|
Orson
Hyde: Babbitt wanted school to continue; Joseph willing until disturbance |
¶ |
Elder O[rson] Hyde knows that Babbitt wanted the school
to continue and said Smith had tended school till the disturbance & had it not been for this circumstance he (Smith) would have been willing for it to continue heard this statement from Eld. Bishop and not from Babbit respecting reading Tho. Paine without having his faith shaken. |
|
Joseph
Sr.'s father urged him to read Paine's Age of Reason. |
Lyman
Sherman: maybe Almon didn't mean it |
¶ |
Eld. L. Sherman thinks
if Babbitt means all he says he is a singular man. & Babbitt
said if it had not been for J. Smith getting mad there would have been
no difficulty. |
|
|
Elder
Rich: Babbitt doesn't hold anything against Joseph |
|
Eld. Rich stated that from what he
heard from Babbitt, he thought he had nothing against J. Smith Junr. |
|
Leonard
Rich |
Elder
Orton: Babbitt said school would have continued if Joseph hadn't got
mad |
|
Elder Orton stated that Babbitt said
the school would have continued if J. Smith Junr. had not got mad. |
|
Babbitt
and Bishop liked debate |
|
He also thought that Babbit and Bishop had the
spirit of the debating school. |
|
|
¶ |
Counsellors spoke to the case |
|
|
Hyrum
and Frederick |
¶ |
President H. Smith addressed the council. |
|
|
|
¶ |
[134] President Williams then addressed the council |
|
|
Verdict |
¶ |
President S. Rigdon then rose and delivered the decision. That Eld. Babbitt shall confess that for the want of conformity to the spirit of God he has spoken things falsely to the injury of J. Smith Junr. and by injuring him he has insulted the
feelings of the church of Christ And that he shall confess publicly to the satisfaction of his brethren. |
|
|
|
¶ |
This decision was confirmed by the whole council. |
|
|
Confession |
¶ |
Elder Babbitt rose and confessed that
he was to blame, for speaking about Brother Smith as he did, & that
he said them in anger, And that he never meant to rise up in rebellion against
the church government of the church, And that in a bad spirit he said
what was proved and sees it was wrong to talk as he did about Brother J.
Smith, and that he thought he would give B[rother]. J. Smith as good as
he sent, as he did. |
|
"… he in part acknowledged
his fault, but not Satisfactory to the council, and after parleying with
him a long time, and granting him every indulgence, that righ[t]eousness
require[d] the council adjourned, without obtaining a full confession
from him—" Diary-2, 91. |
But
didn't lie |
¶ |
Elder Babbitt confesses that he has injured J. S. character and
is sorry for it, but is not willing to confess that he lied. and cannot confess all that President Rigdon has said in his speech Says he knows the council says he has done wrong and is willing to confess it. The decision is correct. |
|
|
¶ |
Brother Babbitt confessed to all present the
charges above stated to the satisfaction of most of the brethren present, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph Dissatisfied |
|
|
Joseph dissatisfied |
|
I attended,
with my witnesses, and substantiated my charge against him and he in part
acknowledged his fault, but not Satisfactory to the council, and after
parlying with him a long time, and granting him every indulgence, that
righteousness require the council adjourned without obtaining a full confession
from him |
|
Diary-2, 91.
Did Joseph make his dissatisfaction known at the meeting and the majority
ruled, in effect, against him? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas
Paine (17371809) and the Age of Reason |
|
|
Franklin
Common Sense (1776) |
|
Thomas Paine was born in England
to Quaker parents. In 1774 he met Benjamin Franklin in London, sailed to
America, where he became editor of the Pennsylvania Magazine in Philadelphia.
Anonymously he wrote and published Common Sense (January 1776), directing
profits be for Continental army supplies. |
|
Eric
Foner, ANB 16:925928. |
The
American Crisis (1776)
Washington |
|
After the Declaration of Independence he joined
the Philadelphia militia and later joined the forces of George Washington
as they retreated across New Jersey. In December 1776 he wrote The American
Crisis, which begins, "These are the times that try men's souls."
By 1783 he had published twelve more Crisis pamphlets. |
|
|
Jefferson |
|
In 1787 went to France in an unsuccessful effort
to raise funds for a wrought-iron scheme. But in Paris he managed to win
the friendship of American ambassador Thomas Jefferson. |
|
|
Rights
of Man (1790) |
|
In 1790 he published Rights of
Man, in praise of the French revolution. In January 1793 he spoke in
the Convention against execution. |
|
|
The
Age of Reason (1794, 1795) |
|
While imprisoned by the Jacobins (December 1793
to November 1794), Paine, a deist, wrote the first part of The Age of
Reason, an attack on organized Christianity and the inspiration of the
Bible. A second part appeared in 1795. He was roundly denounced by clerics
and believers in both Europe and America. |
|
|
Obscurity |
|
When Paine returned to America in 1802, Thomas
Jefferson was president. But he embarrassed the administration by persistently
contributing deist essays to The Prospect, and he fell into obscurity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age
of Reason quotes |
|
|
Believe
in God |
¶ |
I believe in one God, and no more; and
I hope for happiness beyond this life. |
|
Chapter
1 |
Equality,
justice, mercy, etc. |
¶ |
I believe the equality of man, and I believe
that religious duties consist in doing justice, loving mercy, and endeavoring
to make our fellow-creatures happy. |
|
|
Do
not believe in: |
¶ |
But, lest it should be supposed that I believe
many other things in addition to these, I shall, in the progress of this
work, declare the things I do not believe, and my reasons for not believing
them. |
|
|
Creeds
of any organized religion |
¶ |
I do not believe in the creed professed by the
Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish
church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of. My own
mind is my own church. |
|
|
Churches |
¶ |
All national institutions of churches, whether
Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions
set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit.
|
|
|
Scriptures |
¶ |
EVERY national church or religion has established
itself by pretending some special mission from God, communicated to certain
individuals. The Jews have their Moses; the Christians their Jesus Christ,
their apostles and saints; and the Turks their Mahomet; as if the way to
God was not open to every man alike. |
|
Chapter
2 |
|
¶ |
Each of those churches shows certain books, which
they call revelation, or the Word of God.
|
|
|
Jesus
Christ |
¶ |
Jesus Christ wrote no account
of himself, of his birth, parentage, or anything else.
The history
of him is altogether the work of other people; and as to the account given
of his resurrection and ascension, it was the necessary counterpart to the
story of his birth. His historians, having brought him into the world in
a supernatural manner, were obliged to take him out again in the same manner,
or the first part of the story must have fallen to the ground.
|
|
Chapter
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age
of Reason and the Smiths |
|
|
Joseph
Sr.'s father: believe it! |
|
while we were living in the Town of Tunbridge
[17961802]
I endeavored to persuade my husband to attend the
methodist meeting with me
But as soon as his Father and brother Jesse
heard that we were attending Methodist meeting they were much displeased
and his father came to the door one day and threw Tom Pains age of reason
into the house and angrily bade him read that untill he believed it. |
|
Lucy, 1844–1845
draft, 291.
|
|
|
Richard L. Bushman maintains that
Asael: |
|
JS New England, 207n183. |
But
Asael was a believer |
|
by no means agreed with Paine's
theology, however, for the Age of Reason ridicules the divinity
of Christ, the atonement, the resurrection, and the authenticity of the
New Teatament all of which Asael deeply accepted, as shown in his family
address, written about this time [1799]. His act may have been scornful,
an association of the then unpopular Methodism with the deviations of
Paineor
an agreement with Paine's attack on religious superstition, though Asael
stopped far short of the extremism of the Age of Reason. |
|
Asael and sons Joseph Sr. and Jesse founded
a Universalist society in Tunbridge in December 1797. Lucy,
168. |
|
|
Minutes of December 29, 1835
Minutes of December 22, 1835
Orson Johnson's Charge Against William Smith
Ohio Minutes
Home
|